Home › Free questions › AP US History
Free · no account, no card

Free AP US History Practice Questions, Explained

AP US History multiple choice works from sources: you read a short document and answer a set of questions about it. These ten come from our practice exams, sources included.

Take these as an interactive quiz The full AP US History exams

Read this, then answer the questions about it.

The official argues that the grants of Indian labor made to settlers were intended to be temporary and conditional on instruction in the faith, but that in practice the holders treat the labor as property and the obligation as a formality. He warns that the population of the villages assigned to these grants has fallen sharply, and that the crown is losing tribute it would otherwise collect. He recommends that the grants not pass to the holders' heirs.

Question 1

The concerns described in the passage most directly reflect which tension in Spanish colonial policy?
  1. A. Between Spanish and Portuguese claims in the Americas
  2. B. Between Catholic missionaries and the Protestant settlers arriving to farm the new colonial territories
  3. C. Between the crown's interest in a stable tributary population and settlers' demand for labor
  4. D. Between the coastal trading towns of the seaboard and the inland mining regions of the interior
Show the answer

The answer is C. The report weighs falling village populations and lost tribute against the settlers' treatment of labor grants as property. That is precisely the crown's dilemma: colonists needed workers, and the crown needed the workers alive and paying.

  • A is wrong: Portugal's claims are settled by treaty and play no part in the argument described.
  • B is wrong: No Protestant settlers were present in Spanish America at this date, and the passage names none.
  • D is wrong: The passage concerns labor grants in villages rather than any rivalry between regions.

Question 2

The recommendation that the grants not pass to heirs was intended chiefly to
  1. A. prevent the labor grants from hardening into a permanent hereditary nobility
  2. B. transfer authority over the villages to the missionary orders instead of the crown
  3. C. encourage settlers to return to Spain once a fixed term of service in the colonies had ended
  4. D. increase the number of Africans brought to the Americas
Show the answer

The answer is A. A grant that cannot be inherited reverts to the crown. Blocking inheritance was the crown's method of stopping a colonial aristocracy forming beyond its control.

  • B is wrong: The missionary orders are mentioned only through the instruction requirement, not as proposed administrators.
  • C is wrong: Nothing in the recommendation concerns the settlers' own residence.
  • D is wrong: The transatlantic slave trade expanded partly as a consequence of such policies, but it is not the stated aim here.

Question 3

Which later development most directly resulted from debates of the kind described?
  1. A. The formal recognition of continuing indigenous political independence within Mexico itself
  2. B. The abandonment of tribute as a source of colonial revenue in favor of direct taxes on settlers
  3. C. The end of Spanish settlement in the Caribbean
  4. D. Formal restrictions on the encomienda and its gradual replacement by other labor systems
Show the answer

The answer is D. Reports of exactly this kind fed the sixteenth-century reform laws that limited the encomienda. The system was curtailed rather than abolished, and other coerced labor arrangements took its place.

  • A is wrong: No indigenous political independence was recognized; Spanish authority expanded.
  • B is wrong: Tribute remained a central feature of Spanish colonial finance.
  • C is wrong: Spanish settlement in the Caribbean continued for centuries after these debates.

Read this, then answer the questions about it.

The agent reports that the operatives are chiefly young women from farming families in the surrounding countryside, that they board in company houses under supervision, and that most remain for three or four years before returning home or marrying. He notes that the arrangement reassures parents and keeps wages below what men would demand. He adds, with some concern, that the women have recently begun to organize over reductions in the piece rate.

Question 4

The labor arrangement described was attractive to mill owners chiefly because it
  1. A. supplied a workforce that was temporary, supervised and paid less than men
  2. B. guaranteed a permanent workforce that would remain for decades
  3. C. allowed mills to operate without capital from outside investors
  4. D. eliminated the need for machinery in textile production
Show the answer

The answer is A. The agent names all three advantages: young women from farms, boarding under supervision, and wages below what men would demand.

  • B is wrong: The passage says most left within three or four years, which is the opposite of permanence.
  • C is wrong: New England mills depended heavily on merchant capital, which the passage does not dispute.
  • D is wrong: The mills were built around machinery; the workforce operated it rather than replacing it.

Question 5

The organizing mentioned at the end of the passage is best understood as an early instance of
  1. A. immigrant workers displacing native-born labor
  2. B. farmers resisting the expansion of railroads
  3. C. abolitionist agitation spreading into northern factories
  4. D. wage laborers acting collectively against changes to their pay
Show the answer

The answer is D. The women organized specifically over reductions in the piece rate, which makes it a labor dispute over wages rather than any broader movement.

  • A is wrong: Immigrant labor became important in the mills later; this workforce is described as local farm daughters.
  • B is wrong: No railroads appear in the passage.
  • C is wrong: Abolitionism is not mentioned, and the grievance named is the piece rate.

Question 6

The system described was undermined in later decades chiefly by
  1. A. the exhaustion of water power along the rivers of New England's mill towns
  2. B. the availability of immigrant labor willing to accept lower wages
  3. C. federal legislation prohibiting the employment of women in factories
  4. D. the collapse of demand for cotton textiles
Show the answer

The answer is B. Large-scale immigration, particularly from Ireland, gave mill owners a cheaper and more permanent workforce, and the boarding-house system for farm daughters gave way.

  • A is wrong: Mills increasingly used steam, and water power was not exhausted.
  • C is wrong: No such federal prohibition was enacted.
  • D is wrong: Demand for cotton textiles grew rather than collapsed.

Read this, then answer the questions about it.

The executive argues that competition among railroads has been ruinous rather than beneficial. Lines built in parallel cut rates below cost, he writes, and the survivor is not the best-run road but the one with the deepest reserves. Agreements to divide traffic and hold rates are therefore not a conspiracy against the public but the only means of keeping the roads solvent and the service regular. He adds that shippers who complain of high rates in one district enjoy low rates in another that the same company subsidizes.

Question 7

The executive's argument is best characterized as a defense of
  1. A. pooling agreements and rate-setting among competing railroads
  2. B. federal ownership of the rail network
  3. C. reducing wages to keep rates low for shippers
  4. D. the extension of rail lines into unsettled territory
Show the answer

The answer is A. He defends agreements to divide traffic and hold rates, which is exactly what pooling meant in the 1880s.

  • B is wrong: He argues for private arrangements among the roads, not for government ownership.
  • C is wrong: Wages are never mentioned in the passage.
  • D is wrong: Expansion into new territory is not the subject; existing parallel lines are.

Question 8

The complaint about differing rates between districts most directly reflects the practice of
  1. A. charging more where a railroad faced no competitor and less where it did
  2. B. refusing service to the smaller shippers of the region entirely
  3. C. operating trains only during daylight hours
  4. D. paying rebates to the federal government
Show the answer

The answer is A. Where a single line served a district it could charge what it liked; where lines competed, rates fell. The executive presents this as cross-subsidy rather than discrimination.

  • B is wrong: Service was provided to small shippers, though on unfavorable terms.
  • C is wrong: Hours of operation play no part in the argument.
  • D is wrong: Rebates were paid to large shippers, not to the government.

Read this, then answer the questions about it.

The analyst argues that Soviet hostility does not arise from any particular American action and will not be dissolved by concession, because it serves internal purposes: an external threat justifies the sacrifices demanded at home. He judges the Soviet leadership cautious rather than reckless, unwilling to accept serious risk, and therefore susceptible to firm and patient resistance applied wherever it presses. He advises against both appeasement and war, recommending long-term counter-pressure at shifting points.

Question 9

The strategy recommended in the passage is best known as
  1. A. massive retaliation
  2. B. détente
  3. C. containment
  4. D. rollback of Soviet power
Show the answer

The answer is C. Patient, long-term counter-pressure applied wherever Soviet power presses, short of war, is the definition of containment as it was formulated in 1946 and 1947.

  • A is wrong: Massive retaliation was a later doctrine resting on the threat of nuclear response.
  • B is wrong: Détente described the relaxation of tensions in the 1970s.
  • D is wrong: Rollback aimed to reverse Soviet control rather than to check its expansion.

Question 10

The claim that Soviet hostility serves internal purposes implies that
  1. A. the Soviet Union was likely to collapse within a decade
  2. B. American concessions would not reduce the hostility
  3. C. the conflict was primarily about access to raw materials
  4. D. negotiations would quickly resolve the dispute
Show the answer

The answer is B. If the hostility is generated at home rather than provoked from outside, then removing external grievances cannot remove it — which is the argument against appeasement.

  • A is wrong: The analyst expects a long contest rather than an imminent collapse.
  • C is wrong: No economic motive of that kind is offered.
  • D is wrong: The passage argues the opposite about concessions.
Before the real one

Read next

The AP US History practice exams See what an exam costs